IF there’s one thing we’ve learned over the years, it’s to never buy bottoms in the same shade as your skin.
Why, you may wonder? Because you’ll end up looking like you’ve forgotten to throw on trousers.
‘Curvy’ mum Jade went viral on Instagram for all the wrong reasons[/caption]
Her bottom half appears entirely naked, thanks to her flesh-coloured wide leg bottoms[/caption]
Over on Instagram, a mind-bending video has one viral for that very reason.
It’s all very innocent, showing mum Jade Kennedy Gonzalez taking out the rubbish from her back garden.
However, at first glance, it looks shockingly explicit.
Her bottom half appears entirely naked, thanks to her flesh-coloured wide leg bottoms.
In the now-viral clip, which has racked up close to an astronomical 20million views, the mum had paired the bottoms with black Crocs, as well as an oversized T-shirt.
”Today’s your lucky day! You get to watch me take out the trash for half a minute!” said Jade, who regularly shows off her ”curvy” figure online.
Unsurprisingly, the head-scratching post has racked up thousands of comments, with many left totally baffled.
One message included: ”I wouldn’t wear that color pants, makes you look like you don’t have any on.”
Another viewer wrote: ”I thought she was naked.”
Someone else agreed, writing: ”This colour of trousers should be illegal.”
Meanwhile, others were more concerned about the people living nearby.
”What are her neighbours thinking?”
‘No trousers on’
Recently, one jet-setter also left people gobsmacked after she appeared to board the plane with ”no trousers on”.
A video of the passenger was shared on Instagram by radio host Shellian, who joked that she must have been listening to Dexta Daps’ song No Underwear.
“What is this going on?” she raged.
“Lord give me strength. I see no drawers!”
Referring to the airline the woman was travelling on, Shellian added: “Are you going to let this happen?
“You need to ban some s**t. This ain’t right. She have on no drawers.”
Why the latest fashion trends are a disaster for real women’s bodies
Fabulous’ Fashion Editor Clemmie Fieldsend explains why she, as a size 10, is struggling to add this season’s latest trends to her wardrobe.
“If if I was to wear the season’s styles, I’d look stupid.
My job as Fashion Editor is to know what’s hot and what’s not, what’s in shops and what people are wearing. But this season, stores seem flooded with looks I find unwearable — and I’m sure many more ‘normal’ people do, too.
For example, I wouldn’t be caught dead in the love handles-baring low-rise jeans that are dominating the High Street.
And I recently saw a picture of the stunning Sydney Sweeney in a pair — with boyish-looking boxers poking out the top, and matching bandeau crop top. Despite her beauty, I thought the White Lotus star looked daft.
And I had to ask myself: ‘What reinforcements has she got holding up her boobs?’
The other thing irritating me about fashion is, if it’s not open at the back, it’s open at the front.
While I’m all for body confidence and wearing what you want, there’s no way I’m standing on a packed train, or visiting the office, with my stomach, bra and boobs on show. I’d hate to put anyone off their corn flakes.
Right now, Zara is the worst offender. When its models aren’t crouching awkwardly on top of kitchen stoves they are wearing crocheted flared trousers and spaghetti-strapped sequin crop tops.
I’m a 33-year-old M&S woman. From underwear to outerwear, I love them and look to them every week to see what’s trending.
They’re really nailing waistcoats at the moment. Simple and stylish, they’ve got them in cotton, linen and a rainbow of colours.”
However, in the comments section people were divided as to what was going on, with many insisting the woman was wearing skin-coloured leggings.
“You can see a crease at the back of the knee,” one wrote.
“Also, human skin has dimples, uneven discolouration in random spots, cellulite and jiggling.”
But others hit back, as they were certain that the female passenger was naked, after her dress rode up.
“If it was leggings you wouldn’t see the separation of her butt cheeks,” one wrote.
“They are not leggings!”
“Take a photo, zoom in, she doesn’t have pants on! She is buck naked!” another laughed.
